← All case studies

Reconstruction · Canberra, Australia

Belconnen Depot, Canberra — Proving a Fleet Fits Before Committing to Grid Upgrades

900 kW spare capacity confirmed on the coldest winter morning

  • IndustryPublic transit
  • Fleet size85 buses
  • RegionCanberra, Australia

Challenge: Confirm a mid-sized transit depot's electrical service can absorb a full battery-electric conversion through a winter morning peak — the coldest, hardest test of the year.

Belconnen Depot spare-capacity ledger: 3,000 kW service, 2,100 kW modeled peak
Belconnen Depot spare-capacity ledger: 3,000 kW service, 2,100 kW modeled peak

The Problem

Canberra's transit authority set out to electrify the Belconnen depot's 85-bus fleet and needed a hard answer to a simple-sounding question: on the coldest winter morning, with every bus back at the depot and needing to charge, does the electrical service hold?

Winter matters here in a way summer never does. Cold weather cuts battery range, adds heating load, and compresses the usable charging window — all at once, on exactly the days when transit service can least afford a shortfall. A depot sized on a mild-day estimate is a depot that fails on the one day it actually gets tested.

How the Depot Digital Twin Was Used

Step 1 — Build the fleet against real hardware. All 85 buses were modeled with their actual battery capacity and a fleet of 300 kW DC fast chargers — the exact charging infrastructure spec the depot planned to install — rather than a generic placeholder.

Step 2 — Run the worst-plausible winter day, not an average one. The simulation doesn't ask "what does a typical night look like" — it asks "what does the worst night look like, with every vehicle present and full cold-weather derating applied." That's the day a depot actually has to survive.

Step 3 — Read the answer straight off the spare-capacity ledger:

Service capacity (nameplate) 3,000 kW
Modeled charging peak (worst day) 2,100 kW
Spare after charging 900 kW

Step 4 — Watch the peak build on the interactive load-profile timeline. The 24-hour chart shows managed charging ramping up as buses return through the evening and tapering as they depart the next morning — with a scrub bar that lets a planner step through the night minute by minute and see exactly how much headroom remains at any point.

Belconnen Depot 24-hour load profile: managed charging peaks at 2,100 kW through the evening
Belconnen Depot 24-hour load profile: managed charging peaks at 2,100 kW through the evening

Step 5 — Confirm every node in the electrical chain holds. The per-node view checks the service entry and downstream circuit against the modeled peak side by side — both comfortably under their rated capacity, with margin to spare.

Step 6 — Open the storage business case for the next question. With headroom already confirmed, the Storage module is where Belconnen's planners go next: modeling whether an on-site battery could bank even more margin against future fleet growth, priced against a directional demand-charge rate — a "what if we grow" lever sitting one click away from "are we safe today."

The Result

The Depot Digital Twin modeled Belconnen's managed winter peak at 2,100 kW against a 3,000 kW service — a comfortable 900 kW of spare capacity, confirmed node-by-node across the depot's full electrical chain. The peak lands consistent with the published academic benchmark for this exact depot (Hendriks & Sturmberg, 2024, npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport), which models the same fleet's worst-case morning in the 3 MW range before any load management is applied — validating that Belconnen's charge-management strategy is doing real, measurable work to keep the depot inside its service envelope.

900 kW

Spare capacity after a 2,100 kW modeled peak, against a 3,000 kW service

Benchmarked against Hendriks & Sturmberg (2024), npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport, 1, 10

Why It Matters

"900 kW of spare capacity on the coldest morning of the year is the number that lets a transit authority sign off on an 85-bus conversion with confidence — not hope."

For a public transit authority answering to a city council and a ratepayer base, that's not just a planning number — it's the evidence that turns an electrification proposal into an approved capital project.

Features demonstrated

  • Real-hardware charger modeling
  • Worst-plausible-day winter simulation
  • Spare-capacity ledger
  • Interactive 24-hour load profile
  • Per-node capacity check
  • Storage business case module

Source

Source study: Hendriks, J. N., & Sturmberg, B. C. P. (2024). "An integrated model of electric bus energy consumption and optimised depot charging." npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport, 1, 10.

Download this reconstruction as a PDF

The full write-up — every figure, chart, and citation — as a single document you can circulate to your engineer, utility, or board.